bookmark_borderDrain bird

A bird we helped out of our drain today
A bird we helped out of our drain today, a photo by viralbus on Flickr.
A couple of days ago I was standing outside the kitchen door when I suddenly heard some weird noises from the drain, like something was moving down there, but whether it was a rat, a snake or an eel was impossible to work out.

I got hold of Phyllis and some of the kids, and we all tried to figure out what it was, but it was impossible to see anything apart from some obscure movements.

Finally, however, the creature made a very bird-like squeak, and we decided to help it out. I managed to put a stick down the hole, and soon after a very dirty and wet blackbird emerged from the drain.

It looked utterly miserable (see the photo!), but after a few minutes in the sun, it started looking for worms and began to look much more normal, and after another half hour it disappeared.

It might have got eaten by a cat, but I do tend to think that would be preferable to starving to death in the sewers.

bookmark_borderPrimary elections and party affiliation

Voter registration form from Florida.
Voter registration form from Florida.
It appears that Ed Miliband want to introduce US-style primary elections:

Ed Miliband used his crunch speech on union funding to announce that a ‘primary’ will be held to pick Labour’s candidate for the London mayoral election.

A step short of allowing every Londoner a say, it means that ‘registered Labour supporters’ as well as party members, would be allowed a say.


Lord Adonis, a former Transport Secretary and a key adviser to Ed Miliband, told HuffPost UK he expected the policy to be expanded across the country.

I’m not a great fan of primary elections because it gives people even less reason to be a member of a political party (selecting candidates is one of the few things you can do as a member without becoming an activist). However, I can see there are some arguments in favour of them, too.

However, there are quite a few practical problems associated with transplanting this American idea to Europe.

Firstly, in the US it’s the state that as part of the ordinary voter registration collects the information about party affiliation, and primary elections are typically conducted in the same way as real elections. However, I presume Labour are planning to collect the information themselves, and I think that’s going to be very hard. How many people are realistically going to contact the Labour party to tell them they’d like to sign up as a registered supporter? Especially given that Labour are very likely to use the contact details to pester the supporters for money.

Secondly, I can see how the American system prevents people from registering as supporters of more than one party. However, if the parties handle the registration themselves, nothing would seemingly prevent members of other parties from signing up as Labour supporters in order to hijack their selection processes. This wouldn’t be very nice, of course, but politics can be a very dirty game at times.

In short, I cannot see how primary elections can work without including party affiliation on the electoral roll.

bookmark_borderA Man’s A Man For Aw That

When Rabbie Burns wrote his poetry, the radio hadn’t been invented yet, so it’s unlikely most folk had ever heard English spoken by an Englishman. Presumably everybody used Scots pronunciations for English words, blissfully unaware that they were pronounced differently south of the border.

Of course, many words are spelt in a way that makes the difference obvious, but I reckon the Bard’s poems would have been read by himself with many more Scots features than most people do today.

If he had written his poems today, I believe he would have used many more Scots spellings to prevent the readers from substituting English pronunciations.

To illustrate this, I’ve tried to respell one of his most famous songs, A Man’s A Man For A’ That, and I’ve also added the West Central Scots pronuncation in IPA:

  1. Is there for honest Poverty
    Is thare for honest povertie
    ?z ðer f?r ?hon?st ?pov?rt?
    That hings his head, an’ a’ that;
    That hings his heid, and aw that;
    ðat h??z h?z hid ?n ? ðat
    The coward slave — we pass him by,
    The couart sclave — we pass him by,
    ð? ?ku?rt sklev wi pas h?m bae
    We dare be poor for a’ that!
    We daur be puir for aw that!
    wi d?r bi per f?r ? ðat
    For a’ that, an’ a’ that.
    For aw that, and aw that.
    f?r ? ðat ?n ? ðat
    Our toils obscure an’ a’ that,
    Our tyles obscure and aw that,
    ur t?ilz ?b?skjur ?n ? ðat
    The rank is but the guinea’s stamp,
    The rank is but the guinie’s stamp,
    ð? ra?k ?z b?t ð? ??in?z stamp
    The Man’s the gowd for a’ that.
    The man’s the gowd for aw that.
    ð? manz ð? ??ud f?r ? ðat
  2. What though on hamely fare we dine,
    Whit tho on hamelie fare we dine,
    ??t ðo on ?hemli fer wi d?in
    Wear hoddin grey, an’ a’ that;
    Weir hoddin gray, and aw that;
    wir hod?n ?re ?n ? ðat
    Gie fools their silks, and knaves their wine;
    Gie fuils thair silks, and knaves thair wine;
    gi f?lz ðer s?lks an nevz ðer w?in
    A Man’s a Man for a’ that:
    A man’s a man for aw that:
    ? manz ? man f?r ? ðat
    For a’ that, and a’ that,
    For aw that, and aw that,
    f?r ? ðat ?n ? ðat
    Their tinsel show, an’ a’ that;
    Thair tinsel shaw, and aw that;
    ðer ?t?ns?l ?? an ? ðat
    The honest man, tho’ e’er sae poor,
    The honest man, tho e’er sae puir,
    ð? ?hon?st man ðo er se per
    Is king o’ men for a’ that.
    Is king o men for aw that.
    ?z k?? o m?n f?r ? ðat
  3. Ye see yon birkie, ca’d a lord,
    Ye see yon birkie, cawed a lord,*
    ji si jon ?b?rk? k?d ? l?rd
    Wha struts, an’ stares, an’ a’ that;
    Wha struts, and stares, and aw that;
    ?? str?ts ?n sterz ?n ? ðat
    Tho’ hundreds worship at his word,
    Tho hunders wurships at his word,*
    ðo ?h?n?rz ?w?r??ps at h?z w?rd
    He’s but a coof for a’ that:
    He’s but a cuif for aw that:
    hiz b?t ? k?f f?r ? ðat
    For a’ that, an’ a’ that,
    For aw that, and aw that,
    f?r ? ðat ?n ? ðat
    His ribband, star, an’ a’ that:
    His ribband, star, and aw that:
    h?z ?r?b?n star ?n ? ðat
    The man o’ independent mind
    The man o independent mynd
    ð? man o ?nd??p?nd?nt m?in
    He looks an’ laughs at a’ that.
    He leuks and lauchs at aw that.
    hi l?ks ?n l?xs at ? ðat
  4. A prince can mak a belted knight,
    A prince can mak a beltit knicht,
    ? pr?ns kan mak ? ?b?lt?t n?çt
    A marquis, duke, an’ a’ that;
    A marques, deuk, and aw that;
    ? ?markw?s djuk ?n ? ðat
    But an honest man’s abon his might,
    But an honest man’s abuin his micht,
    b?t ? ?hon?st manz ??b?n h?z m?xt
    Gude faith, he maunna fa’ that!
    Guid faith, he maunna faw that!
    g?d feð hi ?m?ne f? ðat
    For a’ that, an’ a’ that,
    For a’ that, an’ a’ that,
    f?r ? ðat ?n ? ðat
    Their dignities an’ a’ that;
    Thair dignities and aw that;
    ðer ?d??n?t?z ?n ? ðat
    The pith o’ sense, an’ pride o’ worth,
    The pith o sense, and pride o wirth,
    ð? p?? o s?ns ?n pr?id o w?r?
    Are higher rank than a’ that.
    Are heicher rank than aw that.
    ar ?hiç?r ra?k ð?n ? ðat
  5. Then let us pray that come it may,
    Than lat us pray that come it mey,
    ð?n lat ?s pre ðat k?m ?t m?i
    (As come it will for a’ that,)
    (As come it will for a’ that,)
    ?z k?m ?t w?l f?r ? ðat
    That Sense and Worth, o’er a’ the earth,
    That sense and wirth, ower aw the earth,**
    ðat s?ns ?n w?r? ?ur ? ð? (j)?r?
    Shall bear the gree, an’ a’ that.
    Sall beir the grie, and aw that.
    sal bir ð? ?ri ?n ? ðat
    For a’ that, an’ a’ that,
    For a’ that, an’ a’ that,
    f?r ? ðat ?n ? ðat
    It’s coming yet for a’ that,
    It’s comin yet for aw that,
    ?ts ?k?m?n j?t f?r ? ðat
    That Man to Man, the world o’er,
    That man tae man, the warld ower,
    ðat man te man ð? ?war?ld ?ur
    Shall brothers be for a’ that.
    Sall brithers be for aw that.
    sal ?br?ð?rz bi f?r ? ðat

I’m not entirely sure how deuk should be pronounced, so I have given the English pronunciation above.

* Update (5 July): I had originally changed lord and word to laird /lerd/ and wurd /w?rd/, but several people in the Scots Language Centre’s Facebook group pointed out that Burns had probably intended these words to rhyme, even though they don’t rhyme either in Scots or English.

** Update (22 February): I had originally changed earth to yird /j?rd/, but further feedback from the Facebook group mentioned above suggested an intended rhyme with wirth.