Metformin cost in australia

Buy metformin online uk


Buy Metformin Online Uk
3-5 stars based on 383 reviews

Metformin is used for treating type 2 diabetes.

Metformin Metformin 850mg $215.46 - $0.6 Per pill xr price australia Buy bupropion xl 300 mg online p.o. boxes david riesman (10:43:42 AM): okay david riesman (10:43:44 AM): any other questions vivalazoe84 is now known Viagra online generic canada as online pharmacy buy viagra vivalazoe84@yahoo.

  1. Metformin North Vancouver
  2. Goulburn
  3. Canberra
  4. Wyong
  5. Albury


metformin brand names in australia
metformin brands australia
metformin xr australia
metformin cost in australia

Metformin 850mg $64.64 - $0.72 Per pill



  1. Rosuvastatina generico sandoz
  2. Orlistat prescription online
  3. Finasteride 1mg where to buy
  4. Xenical rezeptfrei günstig schweiz


  • Metformin in Virginia beach
  • Metformin in Surrey
  • Metformin in Port coquitlam
  • Metformin in Chattanooga
  • Metformin in Katoomba
  • Metformin in Wagga wagga


Metformine 850 kopen -up for about 30 minutes every day for the next 14 days, researchers found. "You can see [a] reduction in cardiovascular events, [as well as] a reduction in cancer incidence," says Prof. Tzoulaki. It also seems to be more effective than a daily multivitamin. In the study, participants who took daily multivitamin saw no reduction in their cardiovascular events. The study's lead author is Dr. Shavit D. Shoham, from St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center in New York. The results may be limited due to the small size of study, but it's an canada prescription drug use encouraging step in a possible treatment for those who are at high risk for cardiovascular diseases, such as smokers and people who have heart or stroke. "These results how much is metformin in australia are exciting because they suggest that metformin trade names australia a daily supplement with melatonin could be a possible strategy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease," says Dr. Jonathan Wackerhage, a cardiovascular researcher at the University of California San Francisco. If it proves to be beneficial, could become an option for those who are overweight and have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. There have been a few other studies that have looked at how melatonin affects cancer cells. One of those studies also found that melatonin reduced inflammation can you get metformin in australia in tumor cells. "You could argue that melatonin is a pro-inflammatory agent," says Dr. Paul Wang, Sildenafil günstig online kaufen who researches human melatonin at the University of California San Francisco. "And that could possibly be one of the reasons it's potentially beneficial in cancer prevention." "This could be that a daily dose of melatonin could be beneficial." However, this study focused on the effect of melatonin heart disease and cancer. "It might be that this is applicable to other diseases, but we don't have studies of that," says Dr. Wang. In any event, it's important to note that a daily dose of melatonin doesn't cause major side effects, the researchers say — so benefits of taking it might not be as clear cut some might assume. "If the benefits are really beneficial, then you don't need to worry about taking it every day," says Dr. Tzoulaki.

Where can i buy fluoxetine online Where can i buy erythromycin tablets Cialis generico precio mexico Bupropion australia price


IndependenceMetformin CascadeHartselle
Metformin PenigMetformin GladenbachMetformin Waldkirchen
Metformin BarabooMetformin North JudsonNewcomerstown


compare prescription drug prices canada
where to buy metformin online uk
prescription drug price list canada
metformin brands in australia
cost of metformin in australia

bookmark_borderLetbane på hele Fyn

Jern- og letbaner på Fyn – i dag og i morgen. Klik på billedet for at se en større udgave.
Sporvogne og letbaner kan efter min opfattelse anlægges rigtigt eller forkert.

Forkert har man fx anlagt sporvognene i Edinburgh i Skotland – de kører kun i eget baneleje på en strækning, hvor busserne kører ret hurtigt, og inde i centrum ligger skinnerne meget ofte på vejen, hvorfor de ikke er hurtigere end busserne mellem lufthavnen og Waverley-banegården, og de er meget langsommere end togene mellem Waverley og Haymarket-stationen. Hvad er pointen i det?

Rigtigt anlagt er de fx i Stuttgart i Württemberg, hvor de kører lynende hurtigt ud til forstæderne og kun blandes med resten af trafikken inde i centrum.

Det forekommer mig derfor, at Århus har gjort det på den rigtige måde ved at konvertere jernbanerne til Odder og til Ebeltoft til letbaner, og ved i øvrigt ved at fokusere på at få den ud til Skejby Sygehus, hvor man kan bygge en ret lige og effektiv bane. (Jeg siger ikke, der ikke er begået nogen fejl, men grundidéen forekommer mig at være god.)

Jeg frygter derfor også, at Odense har valgt den forkerte model – stort set hele den første etape kører inde i byen, hvor den næppe kan blive meget hurtigere end den eksisterende trafik. Alt er dog ikke tabt – man skal blot nu fokusere på at føre letbanen ud til de andre byer på Fyn i stedet for at bygge flere skinner til dyre og langsomme sporvogne inde i Odense.

Se på kortet øverst til højre – her er en forklaring:

  1. Med lyseblåt ses den nuværende jernbane over Fyn.
  2. Med lilla er Svendborg-banen markeret.
  3. Med grønt ser man de eksisterende skinner mellem Assens og Tommerup, som i dag mest bruges til skinnecykler.
  4. En mørkeblå linie viser den næsten færdige letbane i Odense.
  5. Den stiplede grå linie viser den fremtidige højhastigshedsbane mellem Middelfart og Odense, som blev besluttet sidste år.
  6. Og endelig har jeg med orange markeret min drøm om en fremtidig letbane.

Så mit forslag ville være flg.:

  1. Omlæg Svendborgbanen til letbanedrift. Det bliver selvfølgelig ikke helt billigt, men det må dog være meget billigere end at skulle til at anlægge en helt ny bane.
  2. Omlæg skinnerne mellem Assens og Tommerup, som i dag mest bruges til skinnecykler, til letbanedrift.
  3. Når højhastighedsbanen mellem Middelfart og Odense er færdig, så omform den eksisterende jernbane til letbanedrift. Den går gennem Tommerup, så det skaber også forbindelse mellem Tommerup og Odense. Vi har nu letbanedrift mellem Odense, Svendborg, Assens og Middelfart.
  4. Byg også en højhastighedsbane mellem Odense og Nyborg, så de eksisterende skinner kan bruges til letbanedrift.
  5. Tiden er nu kommet til at bygge letbaner til Faaborg, til Bogense (via Søndersø), til Otterup (via H.C. Andersen Lufthavn) og til Kerteminde (via Munkebo).
  6. Nu kunne man med fordel anlægge en letbane langs Rugårdsvej fra Tarup via Morud (og Stillebæk) til Brenderup og derfra til Middelfart. Det vil afhjælpe en del trafikproblemer.
  7. Herefter er alle byer på Fyn forbundet med letbaner, og det nu mere et spørgsmål om at bygge direkte forbindelser mellem nogle af dem, så man ikke altid skal via Odense – fx mellem Nyborg og Faaborg, eller mellem Bogense og Assens.

Hele projektet bliver selvfølgelig enormt dyrt, men det kan gennemføres over en lang årrække, og i hvert fald de første tre-fire punkter burde være ret realistiske.

bookmark_borderCounterurbanisation and the corona crisis – or why this is the right time to buy a rural property

Our house
Our house.
I started writing this blog post back in October, long before anybody had even heard of the coronavirus. I didn’t post it at the time, mainly because I thought it was going to be slow change that would take years to manifest itself, so time was going to be on my side, and I might as well spend a bit longer adding more details. I was wrong – the pandemic has accelerated a change that had probably already started but was moving at a glacial pace, and I suspect things will now start happening really fast: People will move out of the large cities, leading to a repopulation of the countryside and to huge social problems in the shrinking metropolises.

Let’s start with a bit of history: For the past decades, large cities have grown and grown in most countries (and the larger they were to start with, they more they’ve grown), and the small towns, villages and the countryside have increasingly been deserted (or turned into holiday destinations). Several factors have been involved in this process, including:

  1. It has becoming rarer to stay in a job till retirement. This means that it has to be possible to find an equivalent or better job if you’re made redundant, and that is of course much easier if you’re staying in a large city.
  2. The fact that most families now consist of two main earners means that it has to be possible for both to find a good job – again, that’s much easier in a metropolis.
  3. The long-term migration towards the cities has had self-reinforcing effects. For instance, most villages have lost many of their shops, schools and public transport links – in some cases, nothing is left. As a result, living in the countryside means driving a lot – and not just yourself, but also your children. And in return, the cities have got more and more facilities and jobs.
  4. The cheap and abundant food made available by globalisation has made it rather pointless to have the ability to grow your own food (unless it’s a hobby). In the same way, producing your own energy has not in general been done for financial reasons.
  5. Because of falling property values in the countryside, in many countries banks have become rather reluctant to finance the purchase of rural properties. On the other hand, borrowing money for an overpriced flat in a large city has been relatively easy.

This might be about to change, however. Property prices in the cities have risen to crazy levels – young families have to live in tiny flats and/or in remote suburbs.

Currently a two-acre property with a house in good condition less than half an hour’s drive from Odense (Denmark’s third city) costs less than a typical two-bedroom flat in Copenhagen.

Fast and cheap broadband even in remote locations has made it easy to work from home, and if employers allow their employees to work from home most of the time, it makes perfect sense to buy a bigger and nicer house in the countryside instead of living in a cramped flat close to the job.

For a long time, employers seemed to be resisting the change, fearing their workers wouldn’t get anything done from home, but the coronavirus changed that. Forcing so many people to work from home for several months has been an amazing social experiment, and the conclusion in many workplaces has been that most of the work actually is easier to do from home, but that it’s useful to meet up for a couple of days a week to have meetings and have a cup of coffee with your colleagues.

If that’s the pattern that will eventually prevail, it becomes very feasible to live two to three hours away from the workplace. In small countries like Denmark, such as change will suddenly make it possible to live almost anywhere (apart from a few islands); in larger countries, some areas might of course still be too remote. It all depends on how often you have to turn up at the workplace in person – if you only have to go there once or twice a year, there’s hardly anywhere on the whole planet that’d be too remote.

So what will people be looking for, apart from fibre broadband? Good home offices are of course now a necessity, preferably with sound proofing so that you can work no matter what your kids are doing. And the corona lock-down demonstrated the value of having a garden, so that you can get fresh air and exercise even if you’re confined to your own property – although that might be a one-off issue that will quickly be forgotten.

We bought a rural property on a 2 1/2-acre plot of land (heated by geothermal energy) back in September, and it made the corona lock-down much easier to cope with. It’s not even that rural – we’re less than half an hour from the centre of Odense (Denmark’s third city), and 15-20 minutes from my job in Bogense, and it’s much cheaper than a smallish flat in Copenhagen.

Even before the corona crisis, anecdotal evidence suggested we weren’t alone. But now things are accelerating – see for instance this article in The Guardian:

The destinations where London househunters have registered to search in increasing numbers since lockdown include the Sussex beach town of Worthing, Ipswich in Suffolk and Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire, where populations are at least twice as spread out as in the capital. The biggest increase was seen by estate agencies in Aylesbury Vale, in rural Buckinghamshire, where in April 2019, only 28% of people signing up for viewings were from London. Since Covid-19, that number has risen to 44%. Its rolling fields are around 30 times less populated than the London average.

And of course, if enough people start doing this, house prices will start falling in the metropolises and start rising in the areas people are moving to. Once these trends become noticeable, the effect will start reinforcing itself, as people in the large cities rush to sell before the value of their property drops too far while trying to snap up a nice house in the new hotspots before there’s nothing left.

Some people will of course be left in the cities – the ones who can’t leave because they have a job there that requires attendance (shop workers, museum guides, bus drivers and many more), the ones can’t afford to leave, and the ones who won’t leave for personal reasons. But if the cities suddenly are filled with empty, decaying houses, boarded-up shops and transport links that get worse every year, it will potentially become a huge problem to prevent them from turning into dystopias.

Of course I might be exaggerating, but my gut feeling tells me the counterurbanisation movement will get stronger over time, not weaker.

For instance, I expect several other independent developments to strengthen the development, such as:

  1. Self-driving (autonomous) cars and drones will make it much less cumbersome to live in remote locations, because they can deliver your shopping, take your kids to football practice, or drive you home from the pub when you’re over the limit.
  2. Global warming will probably lead to a reduction in air traffic, so living near an airport will be much less useful, and living in a place you actually like will become more important. (So people might not only move towards less densely populated places, but also towards places with a nice climate – for instance from north to south within the EU.)
  3. Farming robots will make it possible for everybody to grow their own food, with very little effort. Most people like the idea of having fresh vegetables and fruit in their garden but can’t be bothered with the practicalities. Once robots take over the chores, most people will want to do this – if they have enough space. It’s just so much easier to be self-sufficient if you have a few acres of land than if you live in a tiny flat.

This means that the ideal property should tick the following boxes:

  1. Not too far from workplaces (perhaps two to three hours from major employers, but time will tell)
  2. Good connectivity (5G, or 4G mobile network and fibre broadband, for instance)
  3. Decent road connexions (that self-driving cars will be able to navigate).
  4. Not threatened by an increase in sea levels
  5. Plenty of land to be self-sufficient.
  6. If it also is beautiful and has a pleasant climate, even better.
Your home office could have a view like this.

In the long term, I tend to believe Paul Mason was right in his book Post-Capitalism, and that automation (AI + robots) will eventually erode the value of labour, leaving only land (and other physical resources) as valuable.

See for instance my review of the use of the Labour Theory of Value in Paul Mason’s Post-Capitalism:

We might thus be heading for a situation where value derives from land (for living on, growing food on and extracting materials from) and energy (which ultimately derives from land, too). So an app or a book will be practically free, whereas a house, a gold ring or a trip to Barbados will still cost real money.

[…] [W]e’re therefore not heading for a future without money. Even if you tried, you’d get USSR-style black markets and corruption in order to get the most attractive house or the newest smartphone before everybody else.

I guess the real question is where people will get money from in the first instance if their labour isn’t needed. Landowners will be rich, but apart from them only people doing important work (such as building and maintaining robots) will be necessary. The rest can then to some extent make money by providing personal services to the landowners and robot builders and to each other, but it doesn’t sound like a very prosperous future to me.

If I’m right, people will never move back into the cities, and the people left there will struggle more and more, because they’ll have to buy food, energy, clothes and other things that people in the countryside will be able to produce themselves. This is pure speculation, of course, but if I’m right, the sooner you swap your inner-city flat for a large rural property, the better – the early movers always make a better deal that the ones catching up.

bookmark_borderEr der en plan?

Der er mange mulige måder at håndtere coronakrisen på, blandt andet:

  1. Vi kan prøve på at opnå flokimmunitet (“herd immunity”) ved at lade mindst 60% af befolkningen blive smittet – og helst i et tempo, hvor sundhedsvæsenet kan følge med.
  2. Vi kan gå i skjul (via hjemsendelse, social distancering og så videre) og vente på en af to ting:
    1. Der udvikles en vaccine.
    2. Coronavirusset dør ud, fordi ingen smitter hinanden.
  3. Vi kan lade dem, som har haft covid-19, opføre sig normalt (altså gå på arbejde, i skole og på besøg), mens alle andre skal holde sig hjemme.
  4. Vi kan isolere alle, som er smittefarlige (ved at teste alle med symptomer), samt alle, de har været i kontakt med.
  5. Vi kan teste alle mindst en gang om ugen, og isolere alle, som er syge.
  6. Vi kan bare lade stå til og acceptere, at sundhedsvæsenet ikke kan hjælpe alle.

corona photoProblemet – som jeg ser det – er, at vi ikke er enige om, hvad planen er, og vi går så rundt med vores egne formodninger og antagelser. Jeg har på sociale medier set folk, der antog den danske plan var nr. 1, andre 2.1, og andre igen 2.2; WHO har anbefalet nr. 4 (men de danske myndigheder har afvist denne plan), og plan 3, 5 og 6 er blevet diskuteret i andre lande.

Men alle planerne kan jo ikke være den officielle strategi på samme tid. Der har været rygter om, at planen egentlig er nr. 1, men at de ikke tør sige det højt. Det er problematisk, da vi jo så ikke kan drøfte, om vi er enige eller ej. Og der er bestemt fagfolk, som bestemt ikke mener, det er en god strategi, fx;

Man skal heller ikke glemme, plan 1 oprindeligt var den britiske strategi, men at de blev tvunget til at opgive den, da det blev klart, det var for svært at måle, hvor hurtigt virusset bredte sig ud, og at der derfor var en stor fare for, at sundhedsvæsenet ville bukke under.

Måske er plan 1 den bedste, vi har. Men det skal i hvert fald siges højt og klart, så vi drøfte fordele og ulemper. Jeg håber, Mette Frederiksen giver os et svar senere i dag.

bookmark_borderPeter JC in memoriam

port in the kitchen photo
Arne, Peter, Jesper, Thomas & Simon tilbage i Sønder Vissing Præstegård tilbage i 2006. Foto herfra: viralbus
Tyverne starter elendigt: Først et brændende Australien og en truende krig med Iran, og nu er min gamle ven Peter Juhl Christiansen (bedre kendt som Peter JC eller Guitar-Peter) afgået ved døden.

Vi var begge tutorer på samme tidspunkt, og sammen med Jesper lavede vi den berømte Russangbog 1994. Da vi havde udvalgt sangene og sat dem i LaTeX, spillede Peter hele sangbogen igennem på sin guitar, mens Jesper og mig sang. Det lød helt sikkert fantastisk.

På cirka samme tidspunkt startede vi en læsegruppe, igen sammen med Jesper, samt Arne og Simon. Emnet var portvin. Vi startede med de billige vine, men med årenes løb fik vi trænet ganerne og begyndte virkeligt at værdsætte den ædle drik. Flere af os flyttede til udlandet, men vi blev ved med at mødes fra tid til anden, og det var planen at mødes snart igen. Vi var jo for første gang i tyve år alle fem bosat i Danmark igen. Nu bliver det aldrig det samme.

Vi var også begge aktive i TÅGEKAMMERET, omend vi ikke sad i bestyrelsen på samme tidspunkt (og naturligvis var vi i al venskabelighed svorne fjender, da jeg var gammel Næstformand og han gammel Formand).

Jeg kommer til at savne Peter. Han var en god ven, og selvom vi ikke mødtes så ofte, kunne vi altid bare fortsætte, hvor vi slap. Da jeg kort kom forbi hans hospitalsseng kort før jul, var han allerede meget svag, men han talte alligevel positivt om portvin og min flytning til Fyn. Jeg ville gerne have kunnet se frem til at drikke pensionistportvin med ham en dag.

Jeg vil gerne til sidst gengive den forsang, vi sammen med Jesper skrev til Russangbogen (mel.: Elefantens Vuggevise):

  1. Nu har vi skrevet en russangbog
    med sange på alle sider.
    Og sangene kan synges smukt,
    hvis altså nu bare man gider.
    Syng til, russenusser! I kan jo godt!
    Og drik en øl eller flere.
    En sodavand, smukt farvet, blo̊t,
    ikke med giftige E’er.
  2. Alene i verden, det er vi ej
    for flinke mennesker hjælper.
    Blandt dem er ric og Jakob især
    og Mor’ndagens Onde Genier.
    Vi fandt mange sange, vi nævner blot én,
    som absolut ikke ku’ synges.
    Vi gav den fluks en ny melodi,
    og nu kan den immervæk nynnes.
  3. Vi har en del problemer haft
    – nej, nu bliver det vist for LaTeXnisk!
    Istedet vil vi synge om
    hvorfor denne bog er fantastisk…
    Den har sange, både for store og små
    som alle kan spilles på elbas.
    Det véd vi fordi den skrevet er
    af Peter, Jesper og Thomas.

Mindet om Peter vil leve meget længe.

bookmark_borderCheapest levitra online

hogmanay photoDet er interessant at genlæse det blogindlæg, jeg skrev for ti år siden.

Heldigvis prøvede jeg ikke at forudsige ret meget, men jeg anede tydeligvis ikke, at skotsk selvstændighed ville komme til at fylde så meget i min liv…

Nu er jeg tilbage i Danmark, og det var jeg slet ikke forberedt på. Flytter jeg til et nyt land hvert årt?

Jeg tør ikke forudsige noget overhovedet – jeg håber bare, verden bliver lidt mindre vanvittig (mindre Brexit, mindre Trump, mindre climate denial).

Nyd tyverne!